Ingenuity Pathway Analysis(IPA) vs. GeneGO Metacore

Integrative methods to study complex biological phenomena
woa
Ubiquitin Member
Ubiquitin Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:29 am

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis(IPA) vs. GeneGO Metacore

Postby woa » Tue Feb 28, 2012 8:46 pm

How many of you use Ingenuity Pathway Analysis(IPA) or GeneGO Metacore for pathway analysis in quantitative proteomics? What are their relative merits and demerits? How open source software/databases compare against these two commercial tools?

Thanks in advance

karthikuttan
Serine Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 3:26 am

Postby karthikuttan » Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:09 pm

I have used IPA. The feature that makes IPA different from all other tools is that they have a very good and widely-accepted knowledge base. IPA is, as you all know, the most popular tool not only because it helps in analyzing the data at multiple levels but also because it provides beautiful representations/figures of pathways/networks. With regard to proteomcs, it is nice to have a look at thisarticle.

I have not used Metacore, so I do not wish to comment on this. I have also used DAVID and PANTHER which are open-source tools mainly dealing with functional annotation/classification. DAVID performed well as far as my specific goals of the experiments were concerned.

And, I should say that there is no Ultimate Tool/Software for any kind of analysis.

woa
Ubiquitin Member
Ubiquitin Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:29 am

Postby woa » Wed Feb 29, 2012 11:34 am

Thanks !! Here's another relevant paper:

Pathway analysis software: Annotation errors and solutions

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20663702

stugendreich
Carbon Member
Carbon Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 12:51 pm

Postby stugendreich » Thu Mar 01, 2012 12:55 pm

Hi all,

I am Product Management director for IPA. I wanted to let you know that there are many hundreds of publications using IPA for proteomics analysis specifically. You can see them here: http://bit.ly/wk1AoJ.

Let me know if you have questions about IPA.

Stuart Tugendreich, PhD

woa
Ubiquitin Member
Ubiquitin Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:29 am

Postby woa » Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:13 am

Hello Stuart,

Is it possible to use IPA with any 3rd Party opensource software like R/Bioconductor and Cytoscape?

Infinity
E. Coli Lysate Member
E. Coli Lysate Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:22 pm

Postby Infinity » Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:01 pm

Is it possible to analyze yeast data in IPA or is it only for mammalian cells?

stugendreich
Carbon Member
Carbon Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 12:51 pm

To some extent

Postby stugendreich » Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:09 pm

woa wrote:Hello Stuart,

Is it possible to use IPA with any 3rd Party opensource software like R/Bioconductor and Cytoscape?



You can use R, Bioconductor or other packages upstream to generate datasets to load into IPA. We don't (at this time) generally offer the ability to use such tools "inside" of IPA. You can send gene lists to GeneSpring from within IPA. And you can import Cytoscape pathways into IPA.

Can you elaborate on what you are trying to do with those other tools? I'd be interested to hear.

stugendreich
Carbon Member
Carbon Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 12:51 pm

Postby stugendreich » Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:11 pm

IPA is geared towards analysis of mammalian genes and proteins.

Virginie
Glycine Member
Glycine Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:04 am

Postby Virginie » Thu Sep 13, 2012 6:51 am

I found that IPA is extremely helpful for analysis for quantitative analysis of proteomics analysis with one caveat: It is very much biased towards cancer. For this reason, I found that the analysis of canonical pathways is sometimes better done using other search engines that in my case are more immunology based and then load the results into KEGG.


Return to “Systems Biology”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest